Quit now
Environmental Destruction

Tobacco pollution’s impact on low-income communities

Published Sep 7, 2023
Vape in grass

For decades, Big Tobacco has strategically targeted California’s diverse communities with aggressive marketing and cheap products,1 placing an unfair burden of disease, death, and tobacco pollution on low-income and communities of color.23 While the health dangers of Big Tobacco’s products are infamous, the toxic pollution left behind in communities is less well-known. The reality is that the toxic chemicals in their products officially put them in the category of “toxic waste” and make them nearly impossible to dispose of safely.

While California has achieved one of the lowest tobacco use rates in the nation, our state remains one of Big Tobacco’s largest markets in the US. Nearly 20% of the six trillion cigarettes made worldwide each year are sold in California. That figure doesn’t include vapes, chew, nicotine pouches, or other tobacco products designed to addict people. All these toxic tobacco products flooding into our state impacts communities where these products are marketed, sold, and thrown away.  

Nearly 11 billion cigarettes are sold in California — creating massive amounts of toxic waste mainly in low-income communities

Because Big Tobacco intentionally and aggressively targets low-income communities and communities of color, a higher number of stores in these areas sell tobacco than in other areas.131415 The more stores that sell tobacco, the higher the level of tobacco pollution exposure for residents. Tobacco pollution particularly builds up around where these products are sold.16

Big Tobacco desperately wants us to believe that cigarette butts and vapes found on the ground are merely a litter problem caused by the people who use their products, and the solution is as simple as ashcans and beach cleanups.171819 But even if people who use tobacco products try to properly discard used cigarettes or vapes, it isn’t enough – tobacco products can still leach toxic waste into our environment.2021 Vapes are particularly difficult to recycle or throw away safely, and most major companies are silent or vague on the best disposal methods for their own products.22 This ruthless industry uses slick PR campaigns to blame their own customers for the pollution, dodge accountability, avoid regulations, and spread outright lies.2324 Unsurprisingly, Big Tobacco claims no responsibility for the tobacco pollution its products generate.25

So, how does tobacco waste really impact Californian communities?

Cigarette butts are made of microplastic fibers and can take decades to fully degrade.2627 Left to degrade in the environment, they pollute waterways, fill up landfills, and leak toxic chemicals into the soil,28 posing safety hazards to our communities.29 Microplastics from cigarette waste can contaminate our soil, food, and water.3031  Research suggests that when microplastics wind up inside of us, they are linked to intestinal damage,32 infertility,3334 and DNA mutations. Even if you don’t use tobacco, you are at risk of being exposed to microplastic harms.

Even if you don’t use tobacco, you are at risk of being exposed to microplastic harms.

Cigarettes aren’t the only tobacco product that creates toxic pollution. As cigarettes’ popularity has waned in recent years, Big Tobacco invested heavily in another product – vapes – hoping it would salvage profits.3637 Instead, they created a dangerous addiction and health epidemic among kids and young adults.3839 And vapes have all the same environmental problems as cigarette butts – plastic pollution and toxic chemicals leaking into the environment – plus, because they’re electronic devices, they leave behind electronic waste (e-waste), which is notoriously difficult and costly to dispose of.40414243 The environmental impacts of vape products are visible throughout the state, including on school campuses. 

In 2019, California researchers did some local investigating, collecting tobacco, cannabis, and vape waste from a dozen high school parking lots across the San Francisco Bay Area. Vape waste made up 19 percent of the litter recovered— debris that would have been hard to find on school campuses a decade ago when vapes were so new.44 Research also shows that tobacco pollution builds up around high schools at different levels depending on the socio-economic makeup of the students at the school.45

These discarded tobacco products – cigarette butts, vapes, e-juice pods and even tobacco product packaging – all contribute to toxic waste pollution.46

As more research reveals how Big Tobacco pollutes our environment with its toxic products, it becomes a more urgent and serious community threat.47 Much like Californians harmed by secondhand smoke exposure, the same is true of Californians harmed by tobacco pollution – it doesn’t matter if you use tobacco products or not, you and the ones you love are being exposed. Tobacco pollution is associated with elevated levels of lead in children’s blood.4849 It may also load certain neighborhoods with unacceptably high levels of nicotine, benzene, and heavy metals.50 And these devastating impacts can last for decades. 

Communities of color and low-income communities continue to bear an unreasonable burden of health impacts from pollution of all kinds – from substandard housing containing lead and asbestos, to industrial pollution and air pollution.515253 Tobacco pollution adds to already unacceptable levels of pollution. Bottom line: No one, and no place, is safe from Big Tobacco.

  1. Lee JG, Henriksen L, Rose SW, Moreland-Russell S, Ribisl KM. A Systematic Review of Neighborhood Disparities in Point-of-Sale Tobacco Marketing. Am J Public Health. 2015;105(9):e8-e18. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2015.302777
  2. Marah M, Novotny TE. Geographic patterns of cigarette butt waste in the urban environment. Tob Control. 2011;20(Suppl 1):i42-i44. doi:10.1136/TC.2010.042424
  3. Berg CJ, Schleicher NC, Johnson TO, et al. Vape shop identification, density and place characteristics in six metropolitan areas across the US. Prev Med Reports. 2020;19. doi:10.1016/J.PMEDR.2020.101137
  4. Environmental Protection Agency. CFR §261.33 Discarded commercial chemical products, off-specification species, container residues, and spill residues thereof; 1980.
  5. Hendlin YH. Alert: Public Health Implications of Electronic Cigarette Waste. Am J Public Health. 2018;108(11):1489-1490. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2018.304699.
  6. Novotny TE, Slaughter E. Tobacco Product Waste: An Environmental Approach to Reduce Tobacco Consumption. Curr Environ Health Rep. 2014;1(3):208-216. doi:10.1007/s40572-014-0016-x.
  7. Krause MJ, Townsend TG. Hazardous waste status of discarded electronic cigarettes. Waste Manag. 2015;39:57-62. doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2015.02.005.
  8. Hendlin YH. E-cigarettes and a new threat: How to dispose of them [blog]. The Conversation. https://www.universityofcalifornia.edu/news/e-cigarettes-and-new-threat-how-dispose-them. Published October 23, 2018. Accessed July 7, 2020.
  9. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Survey Data. Atlanta, Georgia: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2021.
  10. Orzechowski and Walker. The Tax Burden on Tobacco: Historical Compilation 2022, Volume 57. 2023.
  11. Orzechowski and Walker. The Tax Burden on Tobacco: Historical Compilation 2022, Volume 57. 2023.
  12. Novotny TE, Slaughter E. Tobacco product waste: an environmental approach to reduce tobacco consumption. Curr Environ Health Rep. 2014;1(3):208-216. doi:10.1007/s40572-014-0016-x
  13. CounterTobacco.org. Disparities in Point-of-Sale Advertising and Retailer Density. https://countertobacco.org/resources-tools/evidence-summaries/disparities-in-point-of-sale-advertising-and-retailer-density/. Accessed 03/01/2023
  14. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Health Disparities Related to Commercial Tobacco and Advancing Health Equity. https://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/health-equity/index.htm. Accessed 03/01/2023
  15. Yu D, Peterson NA, Sheffer MA, Reid RJ, Schnieder JE. Tobacco outlet density and demographics: analysing the relationships with a spatial regression approach. Public Health. 2010;124(7):412-6. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2010.03.024. Epub 2010 Jun 11
  16. Marah M, Novotny TE. Geographic patterns of cigarette butt waste in the urban environment. Tob Control. 2011 May;20 Suppl 1(Suppl_1):i42-4.
  17. Smith EA, McDaniel PA. Covering their butts: responses to the cigarette litter problem. Tob Control. 2011;20(2):100. doi:10.1136/TC.2010.036491
  18. PM Corporate Affairs: Robinson & Maites litter program development scope-of-work: Philip Morris; 1997. http://legacy.library.ucsf.edu/tid/bhm16c00 (accessed 14 Nov 2008).
  19. Smith EA, Novotny TE. Whose butt is it? tobacco industry research about smokers and cigarette butt waste. Tob Control. 2011;20 Suppl 1(Suppl_1):i2-9. doi: 10.1136/tc.2010.040105
  20. Hendlin YH. Alert: Public Health Implications of Electronic Cigarette Waste. Am J Public Health. 2018;108(11):1489-1490. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2018.304699.
  21. Slaughter E, Gersberg RM, Watanabe K, Rudolph J, Stransky C, Novotny TE. Toxicity of cigarette butts, and their chemical components, to marine and freshwater fish [published correction appears in Tob Control. 2011 Nov;20(6):418]. Tob Control. 2011;20 Suppl 1(Suppl_1):i25-i29. doi:10.1136/tc.2010.040170.
  22. Hendlin YH. Alert: Public Health Implications of Electronic Cigarette Waste. Am J Public Health. 2018;108(11):1489-1490. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2018.304699.
  23. Smith EA, McDaniel PA. Covering their butts: responses to the cigarette litter problem. Tob Control. 2011;20(2):100. doi:10.1136/TC.2010.036491
  24. Home. World No Ashtray. Accessed March 23, 2022.
  25. Smith EA, McDaniel PA. Covering their butts: responses to the cigarette litter problem. Tob Control. 2011;20(2):100. doi:10.1136/TC.2010.036491
  26. Puls J, Wilson SA, Hölter D. Degradation of cellulose acetate-based materials: a review. J Polym Environ. 2011;19:152–165. doi:10.1007/s10924-010-0258-0
  27. Novotny T, Lum K, Smith E, Wang V, Barnes R. Cigarettes butts and the case for an environmental policy on hazardous cigarette waste. Int J Environ Public Health. 2009;6(5):1691-1705. doi:10.3390/ijerph6051691
  28. Truth Initiative. Tobacco and the Environment; 2023 https://truthinitiative.org/sites/default/files/media/files/2023/04/Truth_Environment%20FactSheet%20Update%202023_v3_FINAL.pdf
  29. Novotny TE, Bialous SA, Hill K, Hamzai L, Beutel M, Hoh E, Mock J, Matt GE. Tobacco Product Waste in California: A White Paper. California Tobacco Control Program, California Department of Public Health; 2022
  30. Zarus GM, Muianga C, Hunter CM, Pappas RS. A review of data for quantifying human exposures to micro and nanoplastics and potential health risks. Sci Total Environ. 2021;756:144010. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144010
  31. Novotny TE, Bialous SA, Hill K, Hamzai L, Beutel M, Hoh E, Mock J, Matt GE. Tobacco Product Waste in California: A White Paper. California Tobacco Control Program, California Department of Public Health; 2022.
  32. Zarus GM, Muianga C, Hunter CM, Pappas RS. A review of data for quantifying human exposures to micro and nanoplastics and potential health risks. Sci Total Environ. 2021;756:144010. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144010
  33. Ziv-Gal A, Flaws JA. Evidence for bisphenol A-induced female infertility: a review (2007-2016). Fertil Steril. 2016;106(4):827-856. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.06.027
  34. Campanale C, Massarelli C, Savino I, Locaputo V, Uricchio VF. A detailed review study on potential effects of microplastics and additives of concern on human health. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(4):1212. doi:10.3390/ijerph17041212
  35. Campanale C, Massarelli C, Savino I, Locaputo V, Uricchio VF. A detailed review study on potential effects of microplastics and additives of concern on human health. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(4):1212. doi:10.3390/ijerph17041212
  36. American Lung Association. Overall Tobacco Trends. 2019; https:// www.lung.org/our-initiatives/research/monitoring-trends-in-lungdisease/tobacco-trend-brief/overall-tobacco-trends.html. Accessed May 13, 2019.
  37. Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids. The Global Cigarette Industry. 2018; https://www.tobaccofreekids.org/assets/global/pdfs/en/ Global_Cigarette_Industry_pdf.pdf. Accessed May 12, 2019
  38. Krause MJ, Townsend TG. Hazardous waste status of discarded electronic cigarettes. Waste Manag. 2015;39:57-62. doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2015.02.005.
  39. Environmental Protection Agency (1980). CFR §261.33 Discarded commercial chemical products, off-specification species, container residues, and spill residues thereof. https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CFR-2012-title40-vol27/pdf/CFR-2012-title40-vol27-sec261-33.pdf.
  40. Krause MJ, Townsend TG. Hazardous waste status of discarded electronic cigarettes. Waste Manag. 2015;39:57-62. doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2015.02.005.
  41. Environmental Protection Agency (1980). CFR §261.33 Discarded commercial chemical products, off-specification species, container residues, and spill residues thereof. https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CFR-2012-title40-vol27/pdf/CFR-2012-title40-vol27-sec261-33.pdf.
  42. Hendlin YH. E-cigarettes and a new threat: How to dispose of them [blog]. The Conversation. https://www.universityofcalifornia.edu/news/e-cigarettes-and-new-threat-how-dispose-them. Published October 23, 2018. Accessed July 7, 2020.
  43. Seeberger J, Grandhi R, Kim SS, et al. Special Report: E-Waste Management in the United States and Public Health Implications. J Environ Health. 2016;79(3):8-16.
  44. Mock J, Hendlin YH. Notes from the Field: Environmental Contamination from E-cigarette, Cigarette, Cigar, and Cannabis Products at 12 High Schools - San Francisco Bay Area, 2018-2019. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2019 Oct 11;68(40):897-899. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6840a4.
  45. Mock J, Hendlin YH. Notes from the Field: Environmental Contamination from E-cigarette, Cigarette, Cigar, and Cannabis Products at 12 High Schools - San Francisco Bay Area, 2018-2019. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2019;68(40):897-899. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6840a4.
  46. Novotny TE, Bialous SA, Hill K, Hamzai L, Beutel M, Hoh E, Mock J, Matt GE. Tobacco Product Waste in California: A White Paper. California Tobacco Control Program, California Department of Public Health; 2022
  47. World Health Organization. Tobacco: poisoning our planet; 2022.
  48. Apostolou A, Garcia-Esquinas E, Fadrowski JJ, McLain, RN P, Weaver VM, Navas-Acien A. Secondhand tobacco smoke: a source of lead exposure in US children and adolescents. Am J Public Health. 2012;102(4):714-722. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2011.300161
  49. Mannino DM, Albalak R, Grosse S, Repace J. Second-hand smoke exposure and blood lead levels in U. S. Children: Epidemiology. 2003;14(6):719-727. doi:10.1097/01.EDE.0000081998.02432.53
  50. Public Health Law Center, Tobacco Product Waste: A Public Health and Environmental Toolkit, Law and Policy Partnership to End the Commercial Tobacco Epidemic (2022).
  51. Shriver Center on Poverty Law & Earthjustice. Poisonous Homes: The Fight for Environmental Justice in Federally Assisted Housing.https://www.povertylaw.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/environmental_justice_report_final-rev2.pdf. Accessed -3/01/2023
  52. Environmental Justice for All. Life at the Fenceline: Understanding Cumulative Health Hazards in Environmental Justice Communities. https://ej4all.org/life-at-the-fenceline. Accessed 03/01/2023.
  53. Mikati I, Benson AF, Luben TJ, Sacks JD, Richmond-Bryant J. Disparities in Distribution of Particulate Matter Emission Sources by Race and Poverty Status. Am J Public Health. 2018;108(4):480-485. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2017.304297.

Explore by topic

The tobacco industry currently spends billions each year on slick marketing tactics and political influence so they can profit off death and disease.
Learn more
Even for people who don’t use tobacco, there can be deadly consequences.
Learn more
The industry calls kids their “replacement customers. Big Tobacco sentences them to a lifetime of addiction and disease.
Learn more
This racist and unjust industry has strategically targeted certain communities with deadly products and manipulative messaging.
Learn more
No one’s safe from the environmental damage and health risks from toxic tobacco waste and its plastic pollution.
Learn more
lady in a garden wearing a head scarf

Hold the industry accountable

California has already protected people from other harmful products, and it's time to hold the tobacco industry to the same standards.